s why he fired four shots through the door, hitting Steenkamp three times

Referee Jon Moss was at the heart of several controversial moments in Leicesters thrilling 2-2 draw with West Ham on Super Sunday. And former Premier League referee Dermot Gallagher joined us on Sky Sports News HQ on Monday morning to review the incidents in his regular Ref Watch feature.Should Jamie Vardy have been sent off? Should he receive an extended ban? And what about those late penalty shouts? Read on for the expert verdict... INCIDENT: Jamie Vardy receives a yellow card in the 28th minute for a lunge on Cheikhou Kouyate, despite not appearing to make contact with the West Ham player. Vardy was booked for this challenge on Kouyate GALLAGHERS VIEW: The ref has penalised him for persistent misconduct.GALLAGHER SAYS: In isolation, its not a yellow card, but whats happened is he has spoken to him just before. Vardy had committed two fouls just prior and if you watch the tape, the referee goes to Vardy privately and says to him Im going to have to book you if you continue. For the next tackle, he takes action against him.The mistake the referee has made is that he has spoken to him in private, but if youre looking to yellow card a player for persistent misconduct on the next tackle, he really needs to make it public to everybody so the whole 30,000 crowd knew. His problem was he didnt. If you look at the tackle in isolation, youd say its not a yellow card, but in the bigger scheme of things, it is. The referees mistake was that he didnt sell it to everybody. Vardy didnt touch him with the challenge, but caught him with the follow-through and at that point, he has decided to yellow card him.INCIDENT: Vardy receives a second yellow card for simulation and is sent off, after tumbling in the penalty area under a challenge from Angelo Ogbonna. Vardy was given a second yellow card for simulation GALLAGHERS VIEW: Correct decision.GALLAGHER SAYS: Its definitely a dive for me. The law says acting to try and deceive the referee and theres no doubt in my mind hes trying to win a penalty there. I dont think he is fouled. He initiates the contact and goes into the player, then bounces off him. Somebody said to me he had been given a pull, but if youre pulled back, you dont go flying through the air. I think that sold it to the referee.The referee has to make a choice: has he tried to deceive me to win a penalty? We look back now and its not really about that decision. Its about the first yellow card, because that has impacted so heavily on the second one.INCIDENT: Vardy reacts angrily to his red card, but could he face an extended ban for pointing his finger and shouting at the referee? Vardy reacted angrily to his red card GALLAGHERS VIEW: It depends what was said.GALLAGHER SAYS: It depends on what Jamie has said to the referee and if it was offensive, insulting or abusive. As such, he could be facing down the barrel of a further charge. It happened quickly and he was angry, but we dont know what was said. Only Jon Moss knows that, and thats what will follow through. Is it offensive? Is it insulting? Is it abusive? It all hinges on that.INCIDENT: West Ham are awarded a penalty in the 84th minute when Wes Morgan is penalised for holding onto Winston Reid. Morgan conceded a penalty for tugging Reid GALLAGHERS VIEW: Correct decision.GALLAGHER SAYS: I think he has got to give it and the reason is because he has made such a big point just beforehand with both Morgan and Huth, saying Im watching you.Its quite perverse to be sat here today. One of the things weve talked about over and over again is everybody wanting referees to be more proactive and to give more penalties - but when suddenly a referee gives a penalty, we dont like it. Its a double jeopardy.INCIDENT: In the 90th minute, Robert Huth goes down in the penalty area after being held by Ogbonna. It looks similar to West Hams penalty, but the referee doesnt award a spot kick. Huth was not given a penalty for this incident GALLAGHERS VIEW: Correct decisionGALLAGHER SAYS: Its what he sees. I think he sees Huth foul as well. When the ball comes in, Ulloa had his arm on somebody and theres so much going on in the game, it was unbelievable. Both penalty areas were littered with people pushing and shoving and I think there comes a point where the referee has got to step in. When he stepped in, he pulled out Huth and Morgan and said I have got to do you for the next one.I can 100% see the frustration of the fans, but I can also understand why its so difficult for the referee because hes got to pick the right one.INCIDENT: Five minutes into injury time, Jeff Schlupp goes down under slight contact from Andy Carroll and this time, Jon Moss does point to the spot to give Leicester the chance to snatch a late draw. Watch the moment Leicester were awarded an injury-time penalty and make up your own mind GALLAGHERS VIEW: Wrong decision.GALLAGHER SAYS: Its not a penalty. One thing I am is consistent. I sat here last week and watched Damien Delaney go into Matt Jarvis and I said it wasnt a penalty - and this one is nowhere near. Carroll has been strong, his arm is by his side and Schlupp has seen him coming and knows theres going to be contact. Its what Id call a coming-together and the minute he has touched him, he has gone down. Also See: Thierry Henrys verdict on decisions Carroll: Penalty was harsh Ranieri silent on referee Bilic sympathises with ref Fake Yeezy . Josh Bailey had a goal and an assist as the New York Islanders earned a 2-1 win over Ottawa Wednesday, leaving the Senators five points out of a playoff spot with just five games to play and four teams ahead of them. Replica Shoes . Felton pleaded guilty to attempted criminal possession of a weapon and criminal possession of a firearm. He admitted he knowingly had a large-capacity ammunition magazine and a semi-automatic pistol without a license. https://www.fakeshoes.net/wholesake-fake-air-jordan-1-f139.html . Burris threw for 247 yards in one half of a game -- on pace for a nearly 500-yard outing -- as the Redblacks downed the woeful Montreal Alouettes 26-10 in CFL pre-season play Friday night at Percival Molson Stadium. Discount Fake Shoes . Despite Barcelona showing the same vulnerability in defence, Messis best performance since returning from a lengthy injury layoff ensured that his side bounced back from a defeat by Valencia in the previous round. Wholesake Fake Nike Air Force 1 . Cavaliers shooting guard Craig Ehlo makes a solid play on the ball, but still Jordan hits the amazing shot.PRETORIA, South Africa - The murder trial of Oscar Pistorius, set to open Monday, marks the start of a dramatic new chapter in the life of the double-amputee athlete who ran at the Olympics and became a global star before he shot his girlfriend to death. Prosecutors charged the 27-year-old Pistorius with murder in Reeva Steenkamps death and say it was with premeditation. They say they will seek a life sentence if Pistorius is convicted, the sternest punishment available in South Africa. South Africa no longer has the death penalty. The intense public interest in the Pistorius trial is shown by the launching Sunday night of a 24-hour cable channel devoted to covering the court case. If convicted on the murder charge, Pistorius could be sent to prison for at least 25 years before the chance of parole, the minimum time someone must serve if given a life sentence in South Africa. He would be older than 50 before he could be released. The state says Pistorius intentionally killed Steenkamp at his home in the pre-dawn hours of Valentines Day last year by shooting her through a toilet door after an argument. Pistorius denies murder and says he killed his girlfriend by mistake when he fired four times through the door thinking there was a dangerous nighttime intruder on the other side. A lesser sentence is possible if Pistorius is found guilty of murder but without premeditation. He also could be convicted of culpable homicide, South Africas version of manslaughter in which someone is killed through negligence. Pistorius claims he was acting in self-defence against what he believed at the time was a threat to his life. As well as murder, Pistorius faces a second charge of illegal possession of ammunition for bullets found at his Pretoria house that he allegedly didnt have proper licensing for. Prosecutors say he also will be indicted Monday with two more gun charges relating to him allegedly shooting in public on two separate occasions before Steenkamps killing. The serving of an updated indictment to Pistorius in court is expected to be the first move at the trial at Pretorias high court. He has not yet been formally served with the papers that include all four charges against him, although his lawyers have had the papers and details of the additional gun charges since llast year, prosecutors say.ddddddddddddThe gun charges reportedly relate to him allegedly shooting out the sunroof of a car in one incident and another when he allegedly fired a gun inside a restaurant, apparently by mistake. Those incidents happened in the court jurisdiction of the city of Johannesburg, not where Steenkamp was killed in Pretoria, and prosecutors applied to have the two charges included and heard at his murder trial. Female judge Thokozile Masipa will ultimately pronounce the champion runner innocent or guilty and will decide on any sentence. South Africa has no trial by jury. Parts of the trial will be broadcast on live television, both in South Africa and across the world, and hundreds of reporters are expected to descend on North Gauteng High Court in the South African capital for the start of the trial. The 24-hour cable channel devoted solely to the trial will continue until the case is finished. The trial will deal with the bloody killing of a 29-year-old model and law graduate, but also the issue of gun ownership and South Africas problem of violent crime, which Pistorius says was the reason why he kept his licensed 9 mm handgun under his bed. Pistorius says his fear of crime was why he fired four shots through the door, hitting Steenkamp three times — in the head, elbow and hip. Prosecutors maintain he was simply angry with her after an argument. Members of Pistorius family will likely attend the trial, as they did on his previous court hearings. His uncle, Arnold Pistorius, sister Aimee and brother Carl are all also listed as state witnesses. "We love Oscar, and believe in him, and will be standing by him throughout the coming trial," Arnold Pistorius said in a statement over the weekend. For the first time, members of Steenkamps family will also be in the courtroom according to a family statement that her mother June and others would be at the trial. The parents and close relatives of Steenkamp did not attend any of Pistorius previous court appearances. "All we are looking for is closure and to know that our daughter did not suffer on that tragic Valentines Day," Steenkamps parents said in a statement this month and days before the one-year anniversary of the shooting that stunned South Africa. ' ' '